1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Version 22 - one more thing

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Max, Sep 1, 2020.

  1. Max

    Max Administrator Staff Member

    Lew, you can still use your spreadsheet to select which fastener you want to use. You can then pop over into the generator and generate the part once you've decided its characteristics from your spreadsheet. The library is not a knowledge base - it is a dynamic geometry generation tool.
     
  2. simonb65

    simonb65 Alibre Super User

    The scenario was kind of linked to your video in that you may have an input option (i.e. A particular length) of 10,20,30 which gives the option to allow an angle of 10 = 10-20, 20 = 10-30, 30 = 15-45, so you can enter a value in that range (rather than a drop down) ... if that make sense!
     
  3. Max

    Max Administrator Staff Member

    Ah, I understand. There is currently no way to allow a user to type in a value but only accept the value if it is between a particular range, nor is there a way to generate an output range for a dropdown automatically. You would have to define a parameter as

    10 -> 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and not 10 -> 10-20.
     
  4. simonb65

    simonb65 Alibre Super User

    ... and that's presuming the angles are all integers and not to 1 decimal place, otherwise the list will be BIG! I guess some practical hands on use will determine the need for that level of flexibility.
     
  5. Lew_Merrick

    Lew_Merrick Alibre Super User

    Hi Simon -- It is the Thread Definition set for what will become a complete Parts Library that will define Parts based on "standard" and "available" Screw Body and Threaded Portion Lengths in an overall "selection set." Each Part will end up being Named something (like) "MIL-blah-Screw 0-5000-20-2A N-BUTT-PUSH-RH X 1-500 Long." However the information as to the fasteners mechanical properties will be provided in the (spreadsheet-based Selection Index. -- Lew
     
    simonb65 likes this.
  6. TimoCAD

    TimoCAD Senior Member

    I think I will help as best as I can in my spare time to fill the "Standards Library". Everyone should help to fill it.
     
    jfnewman likes this.
  7. beastro

    beastro Senior Member

    Wonderful!! Looking forward to this update!
     
  8. Lew_Merrick

    Lew_Merrick Alibre Super User

    Hi Max -- One of the reasons I use my (somewhat) strange approach to Project Directory Management is that my "drive assigment system" dates to when I got Gary Kildahl to create a "drive identity list" that allowed me to define "hard drives" well outside of the "C:, D:, or E:" standard identity set that made it easier to pass Defense Contracts Administration Security System (DCASS) review. Thus, for my current system layout "Library Files" get stored on "Drive J:." If I create a Package using this it causes a real mess when my customer goes to "Un-Package" something. That is one reason why I create "Fastener" and "Purchased Components" directories in and for each Project. [It also allows me to include text, document,spreadsheet, FEA, and PDF files in my Archive system.] -- Lew
     
  9. Max

    Max Administrator Staff Member

    I'm not sure how this is relevant - where you decide to save a part you've created from the library is still up to you...like any other part or existing fastener or workflow you use today. If you already have a large standalone library and existing workflow that works for you and is efficient, then you do not have a large incentive to port everything over to this tool - which is fine. Use it or don't! It's there if you need it.
     
  10. Lew_Merrick

    Lew_Merrick Alibre Super User

    Hi Max -- Before I discovered differently, I provided "Project Package" file sets to my Alibre-using clients. They complained bitterly about the "number" and (if you will) "broad locations" where things ended up when they "UnPackaged" such archives. The system I am currently using comes as a "response" to said complaints. I have (over the past decade) "converted" (about) 15 companies (probably averaging about 4 "seats" each) to Alibre as their CAD system. -- Lew
     
  11. Mika

    Mika Senior Member

    This is GREAT! It will really gonna make my work easier. Thank you.

    Just a few things I was left wondering after i watched the video. After we have "Finish" the part configuring on the assembly, is it possible to go back to those part thickness/length etc. parameters? Or is it already created part on the screen and only possibility to edit that part is editing sketch/extrude length?

    Saving the assembly will save those created separated part files? Or can it be always the same item number? Just with the different length/thickness etc. details in a BOM list. True adaptive library part, not separated part files for each project folder.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2020
  12. Max

    Max Administrator Staff Member

    After hitting finish, the part is created and as of that time no longer has any link to the library. In other words, no, you cannot then go back and dynamically change it using the part library UI. You could edit the part like normal and modify the parameters in the Equation Editor, or you could delete it and insert a new one from the library.

    Also as of the time of insertion, the part is like any other part. It needs to be named and saved wherever you like. If it ends up having different properties, or item number, or part name, etc - then you will need to set those things. This is a v1 and we'll consider other things as they arise and we can be sure there is a need that enough people have.
     
    Mika likes this.
  13. Lew_Merrick

    Lew_Merrick Alibre Super User

    Mika -- If you go to the Resources section you can look at the Part Libraries that I have placed there. The approach that I follow is to create Parts of all "standard sizes." Thus, each Part has a File Name that defines it fully -- (say) "SAE J429 Grade 5 Hex Head Cap Screw 0-3125-18UNC X 1-250 Long.AD_PRT" such that it's full "identity" is obvious and part of the File Explorer listing. [Though, as somebody who predates the ability to use decimal points within File Names, I use hyphens (-) for that purpose.] -- Lew
     
  14. Mika

    Mika Senior Member

    It would be so nice if library parts can be just modified with changing those library parameters and not to save it at all as a new part. It would make that "Frame Generator" already a bit unnecessary, this solution is so near to it already. Just leave an option there to "break link to library".

    One biggest benefit would be to reduce files amount in a one project, because most of the parts would be the "Adaptive Library Parts". It would reduce also file management mess, because one assy would not have so many links to each small metal piece. Library part measuring sheet("Cutlist") is so easy to make on assy drawing sheet#2, library parts wont need separated drawings.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2020
    TimoCAD likes this.
  15. HaroldL

    HaroldL Alibre Super User

    Max,
    I like that you've got a new addition of the part generator to Alibre's tool box.
    Your updated video shows holes that appear to be threaded. And the options for holes doesn't give a user input other than what's in the list. Will there be a selection for tapped holes and clearance holes for the standard size fasteners/bolts and screws? Or is the bracket shown just a "taste" of what is possible and the users will need to create the needed holes, tapped or otherwise?

    TherradedHolesShown.png
     
  16. Max

    Max Administrator Staff Member

    That part is just a taste. It has those options because that's what I choose to expose in the design. There are thread options, but this made up part didn't need them.

    Hole type is not currently an option (countersunk /simple /counterbore etc.) but threads are.
     

Share This Page